Bob Runnicles: "Very cool looking, lots of extras and hidden features but ultimately too flimsy to stand decent play."
Sid Dinsay: "My Xmas 2002 gift!"
Aaron West: "Scale makes the Gunship too small to carry it."
Jasse Kaiser: "Awsome model! A little bit flimsy. Building instructions came with an amendment, still contained some minor flaws."
Lenny McKee Hoffman: "sold the figs for $20 - making this set pretty cheap"
Arne Nielsen: "Big and ugly, but with a genuine battletank "feeling" to it"
Don Cox: "Truly awsome, needs more Troopers though."
Vincent Benner: "Very delicate ! But reaally nice."
Andy Blake: "expensive (in UK), ugly, flimsy and poor playability. several minus points achieved for stickers instead of printed bricks. i don't much like this one."
Jacob Davies: "Nice model! Leg construction is weak though, but the angled panels are nicely done. Did we really need another ball and socket part though?"
Amado C. Pinlac: "TRU, NJ 12-13-02"
Ralph W. Caton: "$70"
Greg Cook: "I didn't expect to get this (lack of room & would rather have the AT-AT), but hey, I loved the Gunship. And this is awesome, too. The legs are sturdy and a great preview of the AT-AT. Cool cannon also"
Hendrik SvL Bergmann: "one misb"
Andrew P. Saada: "Started putting it together and was impressed with the construction and implementation, but I bought this baby for the grey parts and those sand blue tiles. Thank you Target clearance! :-D"
Barb Natividad: "Assemble and attach legs after step 29, not after 37, as shown in instr."
Bernard Ouellet: "Lots of fun here! Panels are too flimsy though. But you can't say no when it's 30$ CAN!"
Dan Prouty: "Revolutionary!"
Mark Allon Porter: "Bit flimsy, Still very good though"
Lukas Nabergall: "fragile but good."
Jeff Block: "I don't enjoy plates-over-technic construction; model is big but blah"