Ed McGlynn: "TRU @$2.48 ea. Why not? Glad LEGO took on this theme regardless."
Mark de Kock: "Solar panels don't stay up very well. Building took me longer than expected --> that's a plus!"
David Lovelace: "This one looks like it's geared towards the science class. Fun factor is low. Building it looks like it'll be homework, so I'll save my C-note."
Scott Sanburn: "I got this for 22.50. Nice model."
Chris Langstaff: "$29 (Cdn.) at Wal-Mart. Good for Technic parts. Wheels should have shock absorbers."
Carl Jagt: "Not as structurally sound as I hoped. But purchased for $30"
Martin Bruun: "Fun and challenging build, but the functions could be better though. Great parts pack, but only on discount."
Andy Blake: "nice parts, and an interesting build with some reasonable functions - but I'd like to have seen some suspension, got mine half price (full price a bit OTT I think)"
James Wilson: "Neat model. Not sure how useful for parts. Disappointed at non-working suspension."
Kevin Forsyth: "Solar panel and camera deployment are both very cool, but no articulation in the suspension makes this half of a great model."
Olof Dahlberg: "Too complicated. Good-looking model, but way too many tiny pieces. For whiling away boring hotel-evenings on dull business trips ít´s OK. Finished model nearly there; feels like som parts were simplif"
Caspar Bennedsen: "1 MISB"