To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
Help on Searching
 
Sign In (Members)
6856

Planetary Decoder
79 elements, 1 figure, US$8, 1996
LEGO > SYSTEM > Space > Exploriens
 

People who wrote Notes about this set  (24 people)

Erik Olson: "Uses red 'n' blue discs to read coded decals. Nifty!"
Mark de Kock: "Why would you want to decode a planet?"
Shiri Dori: "Cute, even for a non-Space girl like me."
Felix Greco: "Worst space set ever made, in my opinion."
Scott Sanburn: "Weird looks, not my favorite Explorien model."
Jason Gates: "Not the best explorien design, too fragile. One copy missing 3 parts."
Ronald Plasmeijer: "Very stupid looking set. Some useful parts."
Matt Hein: "The top part falls off too easily!"
Aaron Sneary: "Bought during the college Dark Ages"
: "Weak. Weak in aesthetics and in structure. Too big of a gun for such a small ship."
Allen Carley: "I swear they thing 'decoder' equals 'canon'"
Martin Wallace: "I enjoyed the set but it was a bit frail when built"
Andrew Verner: "Now THAT's a well-armed fighter; cannon can store between the fins outside of battle. Replace the decoder dishes with black ones for landing thrusters."
Irene Raffl: "USED"
Nathan Todd: "Strange."
Mike Petrucelli: "Big honkin gun, crappy ship."
Pat Bunn: "bought it for the clear blue cylinder halves."
Neil Arellano: "Really unique, nice parts as well."
Jeff Rittenhouse: "Well, it has personality, but it's an ugly personality."
Mark R. Nash: "Messy but 1 or 2 nice parts."
Mitchell Blue Hanson: "a little poorly designed, but still cool. A better name for it would be "Explorien Starfighter""
Chris Smith: "Seemed really large for it's price."
Wolf Read: "Very alien-feeling design. And, boy, whatta gun...er, telescope sensor thingy!"
Jeff Block: "Dumb design; doesn't look good at all"
People who Want to Buy this set  (4 people)

People who Want to Sell this set  (4 people)

People who Own this set  (184 people)

Terms of Use  |  Feedback
©2001 LUGNET. All rights reserved.