To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
Help on Searching
 
Sign In (Members)
4709

Hogwarts™ Castle
682 elements, 8? figures, US$90, 2001
LEGO > SYSTEM > Harry Potter > {Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone}
 

People who wrote Notes about this set  (31 people)

James Brown: "$99 CAD (~$65 US) at Walmart. SWEEEEEET!!!"
discord.gg/esquelesquad discord.gg/esquelesquad discord.gg/esquelesquad, discord.gg/esquelesquad: "LOOOVE it, of course I have kids! ;~))"
Paul Baulch: "The 2 slanted roofs are plastic cards, not bricks. Tan elements nicely complement those found in Adventurers sets."
Scott Sanburn: "Good parts, not bad for 50.00. Seems more like a hallway than a castle."
Tim Buchheim: "great parts, ok model"
Drew Dirschell: "Great parts and design, not very solid"
Aaron West: "One of the nicest sets for total parts assortment. Great in large numbers if you find them at Target LOW clearance."
Reinhard "Ben" Beneke: "got it on sale für under 60 Eur - Have built it before 'moccing' the parts. Has some really clever ideas for great play value."
Jason King: "Good for parts, didn't build the model :-)"
Eric Hampusgård: "Sagoland 599:-"
Bruce Schlickbernd: "Lots of interesting parts, a bit too juniorized, but at 50% off, I'm fairly happy."
Daniel Alexander Robert Thorlby: "It may be a bit juniorized, (not as bad as knights kingdom) but it still looks VERY impressive, LAVISH interior, and a CLEVER modular design fits the other sets, - unlike the Knights Kingdom modules!"
Arne Nielsen: "Too open to be a decent castle; parts and castle interior OK, but vastly overpriced"
Richie Dulin: "Fun to build. Excellent play value. A bit light on doors, though."
Vincent Benner: "Nice but would have be nicer with a base. The roof is bad !"
Alex Vizcarra: "for what you pay, you expect more..."
Johan Portmark: "Exacly fig. count is 8 + the bigger fig. Hagrid = 9 figs, but why so expensive?"
Burt Clawson: "Lots of cool nooks, crannies, and surprises. Love the modular design, so it's easy to put together."
Jim Glendinning: "If this hadn't been juniorised, it could have been the best Lego set since 1989. Not good enough to pay 80% retail price for."
Jacob Davies: "Suit of armour is the best part in this, the construction is too wobbly for me (but I'm not a kid). Also, I am really tired of cloaks on minifigs, I am dumping all mine in a drawer."
Josh Royd Wedin: "Great parts lot. Weak design. More annoying modularization. Great knight figure though!"
Rosalyn C. Rabz: "Harry Potter(minifig) looks very ugly"
: "MISB"
Dave Pearson: "Destined to be a classic. Two thumbs up for TLC!!"
Bruce Lowell: "one incomplete"
George Barnes: "$22 at Target, great parts lot"
Pat Bunn: "so many reasons to like this set"
P F: "Satisfyingly grand and imposing edifice, while the inside has lots of things to do- lots of clever tricks & secrets. Love the invisible chest! Fun set, but seems geared for younger fans."
Bernard Ouellet: "This is lot's of fun. Although too many big wall pieces. *Misses old castles*"
Mark Pontius: "My favorite HP set. Great Hall plus towers"
Jeff Block: "Not as good as "real" castle sets, but fits in nicely with the other HP sets"
People who Want to Buy this set  (4 people)

People who Want to Sell this set  (2 people)

People who Own this set  (214 people)

Terms of Use  |  Feedback
©2001 LUGNET. All rights reserved.